Should Senator Thompson quit after a third place finish in South Carolina, as some seem to be suggesting? This is very interesting. Why is it that Mayor Guiliani who has not won one primary or caucas, and is now in single digits according to the latest Rasmussen national poll, is not asked to leave the race; yet Thompson is?
Senator Thompson has finished ahead of Mayor Guiliani in Iowa; and in South Carolina he placed ahead of both Guiliani and Governor Romney! This is remarkable reasoning.
Thompson remains positioned to do well in coming primaries given that Governor Huckabee has been marginalized by losing to Senator McCain in South Carolina. Huckabee cannot attract fiscal or national security conservatives, the other two pillars of the Republican electorate. He only attracts religious/social conservatives, who will now be compelled to reassess their support of Huckabee, a candidate who demonstrably cannot attract fiscal and national security conservatives and unite Republicans.
For anyone thinking that Senator McCain can unite and galvanize conservatives in the Republican Party to turnout in large numbers in a general election to defeat the Democrats, you may want to read this article by Mark Levin dated today, 1/20/08.
http://article.nationalreview.com/?q=MzY0M2U3ZTExMGExM2Q4YTJhYzJkZDMzYzgwMDAzZmE=&w=MA==
Republican voters better start thinking seriously about who to nominate. Every single one of the Republican candidates, except Thompson, alienates enough Republican voters to give the general election to the Democrats. McCain cannot attract a large number of religious conservatives, fiscal conservatives, and even some national security conservatives, given his support last year for the compromise amnesty immigration agreement. Governor Romney cannot attract religious conservatives because of his recent conversion to pro-life and family positions. Does anyone think Romney can carry the South? Guiliani cannot attract religious conservatives; not to mention his personal scandals which the Democrats would undoubtedly re-surface in the general election. Huckabee’s problems have already been addressed above.
At present, Republicans have a major problem. They erroneously believed that Republican voters would support them in the end, in the last Congressional election, and lost both houses of Congress. They would do well to observe that there are enough Republican voters who will not compromise on their principles, and “hold their nose” and vote for a “RINO,” or more precisely, a “CINO” (I.e., conservative in name only) – even if it means allowing the Democratic nominee for president to prevail in the general election. There are enough conservative voters who will not compromise on moral principle today any more than President Abraham Lincoln would compromise on slavery, or President Ronald Reagan on communism.
Indeed, Republicans have a problem of monumental proportion requiring serious contemplation. The good news for Republicans is that although time is growing short, there is still time to reflect and act anew.